(Continued from Part 1, previous blog post)
Such caricatures of Chicago not only date back to the days of Clarence Darrow or the days of Al Capone as the media would gladly recall, 63 but had their academic versions, and in the field of mathematics, as well. The 1998 book “A Beautiful Mind” by The New York Times correspondent Sylvia Nasar about the mysterious but often sad life stories of the mathematician John Forbes Nash, Jr., told of the tremendous interest on the part of the University of Chicago’s mathematics department including the mathematician Shiing-shen Chern, a patriarch figure in mathematics, 64 toward an up-and-coming, flamboyant but abrasive John Nash in 1958-1959, who at the time was on the faculty of MIT but was fancying himself as the “the prince of peace”, the leader of a great movement for world peace, and “the left foot of God”; 65 when Prof. Adrian Albert of the University of Chicago made an offer of a “prestigious chair” to John Nash, Nash responded that he had to decline because he was “scheduled to become Emperor of Antarctica”. 66 Such undiplomatic response and related uttering prompted then MIT president Julius Stratton to call John Nash “a very sick man”. 67 Nash, however, confidently told others that he was receiving encrypted, important political “messages” communicating to him through The New York Times. 68
So in early 1959 the very promising mathematician John Nash chose not to go to Chicago, staying at MIT in Boston and talking out loud about forming a world peace movement, but soon (on or around April 8, 1959), he was involuntarily sent to McLean Hospital, committed and diagnosed as suffering from ‘paranoid schizophrenia’. 69 This sad story has been dramatized somewhat differently in the Ron Howard movie adaptation of “A Beautiful mind”, with Nash portrayed by actor Russell Crowe, in which Nash was fancying himself as having been invited to work for a shadowy, secretive agency that was probably part of the Pentagon, analyzing data related to national security. 70 In the real-world story according to Sylvia Nasar’s book, Nash’s claim was that he received messages through The New York Times, and although years before his world-peace ideas Nash had done some consulting work for the military and political think-tank the RAND Corporation, his association with RAND ended at the height of the McCarthy era in 1954 when he was napped by the police for engaging in homosexual activity. 71
John Nash nevertheless did not really believe that he had a mental illness. Looking back at his life in his 1994 Nobel Prize autobiography, Nash blamed it on the “characteristic of my orientation”, stating that “rationality of thought imposes a limit on a person’s concept of his relation to the cosmos”, and referring to the “madness” of Zarathustra and his millions of “naïve followers” as a case in point. 72
But was John Nash a threat to the society in any violent sense during his “madness” – which would have been what mattered most to others – to justify confining a genius like him to the psychiatric ward? During his ‘self-styled’ world peace campaign in 1958-1959 he wrote many letters to family, colleagues and friends, and to the FBI, foreign ambassadors, the pope, and the United Nations, some of which presumably to do with his thought of (or allegation of) involvement in a “conspiracy” among military leaders to take over the world, 73 but he did not actually lay a hand on even his wife, Alicia Larde, during those difficult times, and his family’s primary concern was that he might be treated like a “common criminal” if he was not taken as “insane”; the technical reason for his psychiatric committal was safety for Nash’s wife, but Alicia Larde also felt that by doing so she betrayed Nash’s determination to pursue his goals. 74, 75
There, however, may have existed real concerns about John Nash among part of the authorities, though the author on the John Nash life story did not make an explicit connection in her book: all of John Nash’s ramblings of world peace and talks of military conspiracy were except an old incident that could have been of concern to the security-minded: when he was only a teenager in his hometown of Bluefield, West Virginia, after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor when the older Americans had gone off to fight in the Second World War, Nash and his teenage friends Donald Reynolds and Herman Kirchner were fooling around with homemade pipe-bomb experiments in Kirchner’s basement, before Kirchner died in an accidental explosion in 1944. 76
Now there could indeed be something there in 1959, meaning that the talented young mathematician might have in fact been capable of figuring out some crucial politics ahead of time – his credibility bolstered by his prior background of doing research at RAND. One can look at it this way: in January 1959 Fidel Castro’s revolution was winning in Cuba, an island just a stone’s throw across the water from the United States, and North Vietnamese communists were also adopting a path of “armed struggle” to unify with the South against the backdrop of increasing U.S. military assistance to South Vietnam; 77, 78 it was not like signs of warning did not exist for the turbulent decade ahead, 79 and ten years later by 1969 when the Vietnam War was in full force and the St. Stephen’s Day-born American leftist William Ayers was founding the militant-resistance organization Weather Underground to engage in a series of high-profile, violent bombings in the United States for radical causes, 80 John Nash’s thoughts by then could have been viewed as a borderline, nonviolent precursor to these later actions of Ayers and his associates; but by then Nash’s expressions had already been concluded as thoughts of “madness” by some (but not all) psychiatrists, and by the authorities. 81
What else would be a better explanation than the above – beside Nash’s own brash behavior and his habit of convoluted language – that a mathematician of original thinking and prolific production 82 who has now been recognized as having made fundamental contributions to the mathematical economic theory, and who has been called “the greatest numerologist the world has ever seen” (i.e., someone better than anyone else at the use of numbers in astrology and other human affairs) by the Princeton mathematician William Browder, 83 was “mentally ill” when it came to his thinking about politics? Recognizing credibility in Nash’s political thoughts is like accepting his mathematical brilliance without automatically overriding any legitimate medical issue there might have been.
(Read Full Article with Footnotes in Feng Gao’s Space) . . .